COVID-19 lab leak theory ‘probable hypothesis’: WHO scientist

The first particular person contaminated with COVID-19 might have caught the virus from a bat whereas working on the controversial Wuhan virology lab — however Chinese officers pressured the World Health Organization to drop the theory throughout a probe into the pandemic’s origins, based on an astonishing admission from a WHO scientist.

In the gorgeous reversal, Dr. Peter Ben Embarek, who initially dismissed the lab leak theory as “extremely unlikely,” mentioned he now considers the chance a “probable hypothesis,” in accordance to the Washington Post, which cites a documentary airing on Danish tv channel TV2.

“An employee who was infected in the field by taking samples falls under one of the probable hypotheses,” Ben Embarek informed the interviewers.

“This is where the virus jumps directly from a bat to a human. In that case, it would then be a laboratory worker instead of a random villager or other person who has regular contact with bats,” he defined.

Peter Ben Embarek speaks during a press conference to wrap up a visit by an international team of experts from the World Health Organization (WHO) in the city of Wuhan, in China's Hubei province on February 9, 2021.
Dr. Peter Ben Embarek thought-about the lab leak theory “probable hypothesis.”
Hector Retamal/AFP by way of Getty Images

“So it is actually in the probable category,” the Danish scientist reiterated.

Ben Embarek oversaw a staff of worldwide scientists on a WHO-led mission to China in January to work with native officers to uncover the origins of the lethal illness, which has now killed greater than 4.3 million folks worldwide.

The staff discovered no proof a lab employee was affected person zero in the course of the joint fact-finding mission — however Chinese scientists and officers withheld info and pressured them to drop the theory, he mentioned.

WHO scientists weren’t allowed to see correct information, and the theory wasn’t even mentioned till two days earlier than the staff was scheduled to go away China, he informed interviewers.

Researchers work in a lab of Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in Wuhan in central China's Hubei province Thursday, Feb. 23, 2017.
Patient Zero might have caught COVID-19 from a bat on the Wuhan virology lab.
CharacteristicChina by way of AP Images

“In the beginning, they didn’t want anything about the lab [in the report], because it was impossible, so there was no need to waste time on that,” Ben Embarek, a meals security and animal ailments knowledgeable, mentioned.

“We insisted on including it, because it was part of the whole issue about where the virus originated.”

The scientist admitted his staff was denied entry to books or paperwork “directly from the laboratory.”

“We got a presentation, and then we talked about and asked the questions we wanted to ask, but we did not get to look at any documentation at all,” he mentioned.

Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan
Chinese scientists and officers withheld info from the World Health Organization.
Hector Retamal by way of Getty Images

“It was right up to the end that it was discussed whether it should be included or not.”

He chalked the less-than-transparent — and doubtlessly misleading —  attitudes of Chinese scientists and officers as much as a doable effort to avoid wasting face.

“It’s probably because it means that there is a human error behind such an incident, and they are not very happy to admit it,” he confessed.

“There is partly the traditional Asian feeling that you should not lose face, and then the whole system also focuses a lot on the fact that you are infallible and that everything must be perfect,” he continued.

Peter Ben Embarek
Dr. Peter Ben Embarek oversaw a staff of scientists on a WHO-led mission to China to uncover the origins of COVID-19.
Hector Retamal/AFP by way of Getty Images

“It could also be that someone wants to hide something. Who knows?”

The Wuhan Institute of Virology specialised in learning bat-based coronaviruses just like the virus which causes COVID-19 — and was discovered to be holding the virus’ closest genetic cousin, based on the report. 

The lab is positioned roughly 160 toes from the seafood market the place an outbreak first emerged in late 2019.

During the WHO staff’s investigation, scientists got curated information and proof accrued by Chinese officers, Embarek mentioned.

Security personnel stand guard outside the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan as members of the World Health Organization (WHO) team investigating the origins of the COVID-19 coronavirus make a visit to the institute in Wuhan in China's central Hubei province on February 3, 2021.
Security personnel stand guard outdoors the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan as members of the World Health Organization examine the origins of the COVID-19, February 3, 2021.
Hector Retamal/AFP by way of Getty Images

Their findings, released in March, finally concluded that transmission of the virus from bats to people by means of one other animal was the more than likely situation.

However, their conclusion obtained swift criticism from quite a lot of nations in regards to the sturdy hand the Chinese authorities performed within the investigation.

“Together, we support a transparent and independent analysis and evaluation, free from interference and undue influence, of the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic​,” the State Department said in a statement launched shortly after the findings went public.​

“In this regard, we join in expressing shared concerns regarding the recent WHO-convened study in China, while at the same time reinforcing the importance of working together toward the development and use of a swift, effective, transparent, science-based, and independent process for international evaluations of such outbreaks of unknown origin in the future​,” it mentioned. 

This aerial view shows the P4 laboratory (C) on the campus of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan in China's central Hubei province on May 27, 2020.
The Wuhan Institute of Virology specialised in learning bat-based coronaviruses.
Hector Retamal/AFP by way of Getty Images

In February, earlier than the ultimate report was revealed, Ben Embarek admitted his staff wanted extra proof to determine the supply of the virus.

“Our initial findings suggest that the introduction through an intermediary host species is the most likely pathway and one that will require more studies and more specific targeted research,” he mentioned.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.