Dems renew court-packing calls after Supreme Court decisions

Left-wing Democrats are revisiting their calls to pack the Supreme Court following two 6-3 rulings in conservatives’ favor.

“Today’s ruling is another blow to voting rights,” Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) tweeted Thursday of the court docket ruling within the Arizona case, “We have no time to waste to protect the right to vote. We must abolish the filibuster and pass the For the People Act and John Lewis Voting Rights Act.”

“And we must expand the Supreme Court,” he added.

The nation’s highest bench upheld two voting laws in Arizona Thursday handed to make sure election integrity.

The court docket dominated 6-3 for the Republican-passed laws, saying that the payments don’t violate the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

“Today, the Supreme Court once again gutted the Voting Rights Act,” Rep. Mondaire Jones (D-NY), wrote on Twitter. “If we don’t expand the Court soon, we will no longer have a democracy to protect. What are we waiting for?”

In a retweet that bemoaned Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) confirming three justices to the bench beneath President Trump, Jones added that, “And still some people have the nerve to question whether Court expansion is necessary.”

Sen. Ed Markey
Sen. Ed Markey referred to as the ruling “another blow to voting rights.”
Getty Images for Green New Deal

Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) additionally wrote on Twitter to slam the Arizona resolution, claiming it “yet another attack on our voting rights.”

“Congress must act. Abolish the Jim Crow filibuster. Pass the For The People Act. Pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Act. Expand the court. Save our democracy,” she added.

Markey, Jones, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) launched laws to expand the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 in April.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi instantly vowed to not convey the invoice to the ground for a vote, nevertheless.

Supreme Court
During the 2020 Democratic presidential major, Biden mentioned a number of occasions he didn’t help packing the court docket.
AP

“I support the president’s commission to study a such a proposal,” she mentioned, occurring to say that she and her members have been targeted on President Biden’s infrastructure package deal and never the federal judiciary.

As for whether or not she would finally help packing the court docket, Pelosi mentioned the jury was nonetheless out.

“I don’t know that that’s a good idea or bad idea. I think it’s an idea that to be considered. And I think the president’s taking the right approach to, to have a commission to study such a thing,” the top-ranking House Democrat mentioned, calling Biden’s transfer itself “a big step.”

During the 2020 Democratic presidential major, Biden mentioned a number of occasions he didn’t help packing the court docket, vowing in an interview with Iowa Starting Line that Democrats would “live to rue that day.”

During a major debate, the then-Democratic front-runner warned that including extra justices to the nation’s highest bench was able to backfiring.

“I would not get into court packing. We add three justices. Next time around, we lose control, they add three justices. We begin to lose any credibility the court has at all,” he argued.

Facing stress from the left following just a few months in workplace, nevertheless, Biden signed an govt order final week creating a commission to look into the matter.

The fee could be “comprised of a bipartisan group of experts on the Court and the Court reform debate,” the White House mentioned on the time.

But Republicans and authorized purists have decried the idea as “court packing,” warning it is going to undo the Supreme Court’s historic insulation from politics.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.