Meme investors should heed ‘manic’ lesson of Fannie-Freddie collapse

The sensible cash thinks it’s solely a matter of time — weeks, possibly days — earlier than the meme-stock craze lastly evaporates. But if historical past is any information, this mania hasn’t fairly run its course.  

For proof, look no additional than the unusual, decade-plus-long funding mania over shares of the bailed-out mortgage giants, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

That F&F mania got here to an abrupt finish Wednesday (for causes I’ll describe in a bit), however not earlier than suckering hordes of small investors to mortgage their retirement financial savings on what are actually penny shares.

It should function a lesson to the meme-stock fanatics, although my guess is that it gained’t.

Fannie & Freddie would look like bizarre firms for a inventory mania to take maintain, however then once more, so is AMC Theatres, the money-losing, debt-laden movie chain that for some motive has grow to be a darling of the meme-investor motion on Reddit.

Manias work that method: They defy logic. If they final lengthy sufficient, the suckers hear solely to themselves in order that no quantity of rational discourse can pierce their cult-like investment thesis.

Such was the case of Fannie & Freddie, firms created via acts of Congress. Their aim: To assist facilitate housing for the plenty. Banks wish to keep away from making 30-year mounted mortgages (fashionable amongst first-time home buyers) as a result of they’re dangerous, given the vicissitudes of the economic system.

That is the place Fan & Fred step in: They buy the mortgages from banks and package deal them into bonds offered to investors on the lookout for yield.

Seems like a win-win. Banks can now make loans that they wouldn’t usually need to; middle-class individuals can unfold the fee of proudly owning a house over a number of a long time. The authorities helps facilitate wealth creation for common Americans via homeownership.

Then one thing unusual occurred: Congress determined that they should each grow to be public firms, answering to each shareholders who demanded a revenue and authorities housing bureaucrats who needed everybody to personal a house.

The twin function of Fan & Fred spelled hassle. The firms have been magnets for fraud. They might make cash seamlessly for public shareholders as a result of they might borrow at authorities charges to ­finance their operations.

Once upon a time, investors brought endless hype into Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac until they plunged the housing market into the 2008 financial crisis.
Once upon a time, investors introduced countless hype into Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac till they plunged the housing market into the 2008 monetary disaster.
Getty Images

That authorities assist additionally meant they took outsized dangers. Over time, the entities helped spawn the 2008 financial crisis by buying mortgages from individuals with a pulse however possibly no job, resulting in large defaults. Just earlier than Lehman Brothers collapsed, Fan & Fred have been about to fall into insolvency, and have been taken over by the federal authorities.

To save Fan & Fred from themselves, taxpayers pumped round $200 billion into the entities. Through 2009 to early 2013, their shares have been buying and selling beneath $1 as the federal government seized any income they earned.

Seems like a pair of shares you may need to steer clear of, proper? Again, manias defy logic. An absurd funding thesis was born out of the notion that the federal government ­actually didn’t must take over Fan & Fred — they did so as a result of the large banks needed their enterprise.

Adding to the mania, in some unspecified time in the future not lengthy after the federal government takeover, Fan & Fred grew to become worthwhile once more, extra alleged proof that these have been nice companies. A pair of hedge funds and investors together with Perry Capital and Fairholme Funds sued the Treasury Department as a result of they argued ongoing conservatorship was unlawful and the cash the Treasury was taking out of Fan & Fred was thus unlawful.

It belongs to the shareholders, they argued for many of the previous decade. Overlooked was the little element that made Fan & Fred worthwhile all through their existence: Since they’re so-called Government Sponsored Enterprises, they will borrow cheaply at authorities charges to finance their operations. If they have been actual public firms borrowing at market charges, these income would disappear.

But the proverbial mania prepare had left the station. Fan & Fred developed a cult following on social media (sound acquainted?) generally known as #Fanniegate to underscore the ­Watergate-style alleged corruption of the federal government takeover. 

Retail investors started to flood into the inventory. Shares now not stalled nicely beneath a buck; they started to surge on and off, sometimes buying and selling to round $5 a share on the expectation that miraculously the courtroom circumstances would prevail, or the Trump administration would return the income to shareholders as half of broader ­privatization.

Even when the Trump administration signaled that it was not going to do what the shareholders needed, the cult saved hope alive that the lawsuits, and one earlier than the Supreme Court, would prevail.

Wrong once more. On Wednesday, the Supremes dominated as sober-minded investors knew they’d: That what the federal government giveth, it might ­legally take away.

As this column goes to press, shares of Fan & Fred are heading again the place they belonged from the start: Below a buck. It took 10 years or so to reveal that the insanity of crowds is a awful funding thesis.

If historical past and customary sense are any information, like Fan & Fred the meme mania for GameStop, AMC and others might additionally proceed for a while.

And additionally with the identical disastrous ­outcomes for investors.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.