NY pension fund puts Unilever on notice for Ben & Jerry’s sales ban

The most important pension fund for New York’s state authorities employees and retirees warned Ben & Jerry’s mum or dad firm Unilever Friday that it’d limit its investments within the firm due to the ice cream maker’s decision to halt sales in Israeli-occupied territories.

In a letter obtained by The Post, Liz Gordon, Executive Director of Corporate Governance for the $254.8-billion New York State Common Retirement Fund, knowledgeable Unilever CEO Alan Jope that State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli “is troubled and concerned” by Ben & Jerry’s announcement.

Gordon famous that the state pension fund has a coverage of limiting investments in corporations concerned within the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) motion, and stories counsel that “Ben & Jerry’s, a Unilever wholly owned subsidiary, is involved in BDS activities.”

“The Fund views BDS activities as a potential threat to Israel, its economy, and, as a result, the Fund’s relevant investments,” she wrote. “Further, various U.S. states have acted or are contemplating actions to penalize corporations that interact in such habits.

“As a result, companies that engage in BDS activities may face legal, reputational and financial risks.”

Gordon gave Jope 90 days to reply to the letter and “confirm or deny whether Unilever or its subsidiaries have undertaken any activities with the intent to penalize, inflict economic harm on, or limit commercial relations with, the State of Israel.”

She added that if the corporate fails to reply, London-based Unilever might be “subject to a detailed review and staff recommendation, which may include investment restrictions.”

According to the New York State Common Retirement Fund’s most up-to-date annual report, it has about $73 million invested in Unilever.

Representatives for Unilever didn’t return The Post’s request for remark.

The letter comes simply days after the Vermont-based ice cream firm introduced that it’s going to let its partnership settlement with its Israel-based licensee lapse on the finish of the 12 months.

“We believe it is inconsistent with our values for Ben & Jerry’s ice cream to be sold in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT),” the corporate said in a statement.

The time period Occupied Palestinian Territories has been used for years to explain the areas occupied by Israel since 1967, specifically the West Bank, together with East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, based on the European Council on Foreign Relations.

Ben & Jerry’s clarified that it’s not pulling out of Israel, the place it would proceed to promote ice cream “through a different arrangement.”

The transfer drew backlash not simply from New York state, however a number of others with anti-boycott legal guidelines, as effectively.

Florida state CFO Jimmy Patronis, who controls public pension funds for the state, despatched his personal letter to CEO of Ben & Jerry’s Matthew McCarthy on Thursday.

He notified the corporate that its announcement “may result in your business being placed on Florida’s Scrutinized Companies that Boycott Israel List pursuant to Florida Statutes.”

“As you may know, Florida law prohibits the state from investing in companies that discriminate against Israel by refusing to deal with or terminate business activities in a discriminatory matter,” mentioned.

He added that if the corporate is added to the state’s checklist, each Ben & Jerry’s and Unilever could be barred from getting into into or renewing contracts with the state.

In complete, there are 35 US states which have signed comparable legal guidelines aimed toward stopping states from funding corporations that boycott Israel, based on Israel’s ambassador to the US Gilad Erdan.

Earlier this week, Erdan despatched a letter to the governors of these states calling on them to take motion towards Unilever for Ben & Jerry’s announcement.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.