TSA mask mandate all for show and other commentary

Libertarian: TSA Mask Mandate All for Show

In a show of “ ‘hygiene theater,’ gratuitously incommoding passengers to create the illusion of added safety,” the Transportation Security Administration has prolonged mask necessities for all passengers, vaccinated or not, till Sept. 13, gripes Reason’s Jacob Sullum. The TSA is making an attempt to “pass the buck” by blaming Centers for Disease Control and Prevention tips, however the CDC truly OK’d the vaccinated going mask-less. Given the few COVID-19 instances linked to air journey and “the remarkable effectiveness of vaccines, forcing passengers to continue wearing masks even after they have been vaccinated cannot reasonably be expected to provide any significant additional safety.” Airlines may nonetheless have opted to “placate irrationally fearful employees and passengers by imposing a gratuitous burden on vaccinated customers,” however the TSA “is not giving them any choice in the matter.”

From the best: Asian Hate Lurks in Elite Schools

“Today’s anti-Asian racism is usually expressed . . . in the progressive patois of a ‘culture’ of ‘diversity’ ” in elite excessive colleges throughout the nation, thunders George Will at The Washington Post. At Thomas Jefferson HS, “a selective STEM magnet school with a national reputation for excellence” and a majority-Asian-American scholar physique in Fairfax, Va., the varsity board is revamping the admissions course of to “engineer a student body in which racial and ethnic groups are ‘proportional’ to their shares of the county’s population.” It’s doing this by axing the admissions take a look at, on which Asian-American college students excel, and limiting “the number of ­admissions from particular middle schools.” Yet “most beneficiaries will be white.” Beware “today’s saturation of national life with government-endorsed and government-enforced racial discrimination.”

Conservative: Biden’s ‘Ghoulish’ Abortion Move

President Biden needs to strike the Hyde Amendment, which bars direct federal funding of most abortions — “going full-ghoul while trying to jettison what for 45 years has been both his own position and US policy,” fumes Quin Hillyer at the Washington Examiner. This “would end decades of bipartisan agreement that, no matter what one’s position on the legality of abortion, at least it is enough of a morally fraught issue that the money of anti-abortion taxpayers should not be confiscated to pay for the taking of [babies’] lives. The consensus . . . was both moral and commonsensical. When a third of the population thinks that a procedure is murder, and another third finds it morally problematic enough to favor considerable restrictions on it, it is unethical to use the plenary force of government to make those two-thirds materially support it.”

Law prof: The Supremes’ 9-0 Message

The Supreme Court’s latest “display of unanimity is notable given the calls by Democratic leaders to pack the court,” observes Jonathan Turley at his site. In 4 instances the final fortnight, on matters from immigration to tribal authority to funding ­environmental restoration on Guam, the 9 ­Supremes dominated unanimously. This “extraordinary” string of choices could possibly be the justices’ “implied message” that the courtroom “is not nearly as rigid and divided as suggested” by Democrats. After Justice Stephen Breyer just lately “warned against any move to expand the Supreme Court” (as did Ruth Bader Ginsburg earlier than her demise), liberals “swiftly denounced” him and “called for his retirement.” Perhaps the “scheduling of these unanimous opinions” is the excessive courtroom “clearing its throat on these campaigns and threats.”

Supply-sider: Biden’s Given Up on Growth

“There is virtually no growth in” President Biden’s $6 billion spending plan, warns Larry Kudlow at The New York Sun. After all the “hullabaloo of radical transformation” in Biden’s many proposals, he nonetheless initiatives “the same sub-2 percent growth of the Obama-Biden stagnation years.” Huh? “If you’re going to transform the economy and the culture, at least show that you believe it will create more jobs, higher wages, bigger family incomes and a rejuvenated economy.” This reveals that “the Democrats don’t care about growth and prosperity. They just say they do. What they want is redistribution.”

— Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.