Zahir’s parents had nothing to do with murder, argue lawyers

The separate lawyers for Zahir Jaffer’s mom and father argued that Asmat and Zakir had nothing to do with their son’s actions, couldn’t have erased proof and had been in Karachi when the homicide befell, which is why they need to be granted bail.

A decide has reserved judgement for a day on whether or not to grant bail to the parents of Zahir Jaffer, who’s the important thing accused within the Noor Mukadam homicide case.

On Wednesday, Additional Sessions Judge Muhmmad Sohail held the listening to during which some new information had been placed on report. The courtroom proceedings took round two and a half hours with the protection counsels pleading the courtroom award bail to Asmat Adam, the mom, and Zakir Jaffer, the daddy, of Zahir.

The protection counsels prayed the courtroom that there have been adequate grounds to award bail however the prosecution argued that there have been sufficient causes to imagine that prima facie his parents had a connection with the homicide case.

Defense counsel for Zakir Jaffer, Rizwan Abbasi, stated that on July 20 at 11:30pm a case for homicide was registered on the grievance of Shaukat Mukadam, Noor’s father. He learn the contents of the FIR in courtroom and maintained that in a while, three extra sections had been added to the FIR. He argued that originally there was no point out of Zakir Jaffer within the case.

The protection counsel was of the view that his shopper (the daddy) had since day one publically maintained that he was standing with the affected household and not at all would they stand with his son.

He stated {that a} supplementary utility within the case was registered on July 24 on the premise of the investigations and assertion of the important thing accused earlier than the police. According to the police investigation, Zahir confessed that Noor was not prepared to marry him which is why he killed her by slitting her throat.

Moreover, in accordance to the prosecution, the lawyer acknowledged, Zahir had informed the police that his father had informed him that he would assist with a way out and that therapists would do away with the physique. But in accordance to the Abbasi, the assertion of the accused to the police can’t be offered in courtroom as a chunk of proof.

Abbasi quoted judgments to help his argument. He stated that his shopper (Zahir’s father) was not conscious of what was occurring at his dwelling in Islamabad. He stated that underneath the regulation, his shopper was not certain to inform the police a couple of doable mishap. His shopper was in Karachi and he took a flight to Islamabad as quickly as he learnt in regards to the incident.

Abbasi stated no credible knowledge in type of messages, name recordings or WhatsApp messages had been out there to set up that Zahir’s parents had any information of a criminal offense being dedicated. He stated all name knowledge related with the homicide case falls within the routine calls class. Moreover, individuals sitting in Karachi can’t destroy proof for a case in Islamabad. He stated his shopper was a gentleman, a businessman, and so they do not have any connection with the act of their son.

The lawyer stated when the parents learnt about their son’s drug use, they stopped giving him pocket cash. Earlier, they despatched him to the US the place he grew to become addicted and so they introduced him again and admitted him to a rehabilitation centre.

Their lawyer argued that the parents are prepared to face trial but when nothing is confirmed towards them, then who can be answerable for their detention?

Zahir’s mom Asmat Adnan’s lawyer is Asad Jamal. He argued for her bail utility, saying that Zahir Jaffer was an grownup of 28 years and was unbiased in his affairs. To this level, the decide stated that when there was speak about pocket cash being stopped it proves that he was not an “independent”.

The protection lawyer argued, how can a mom assess that her son would commit a homicide?

Shah Khawar, who’s representing Noor’s father, acknowledged that the CDR and CCTV information set up the purpose that the parents are linked with the homicide case. He talked in regards to the calls which Zahir made to his mum or dad on July 20, when Noor was murdered.

He stated the principal accused made a name at 6:35pm to his father for 112 seconds and later one other name at 6:37pm for 74 seconds. He argued that in accordance to the information, the offense of homicide had not been dedicated by that point.

He stated Zahir made one other name at 7:29pm to his father, which was 46 seconds lengthy. Then Zahir made a name to his mom Asmat at 3pm for 1,055 seconds and this was the interval when Noor was in his possession.

He stated Asmat made a cellphone name to her husband for 2 minutes and 36 seconds. Khawar stated that the chowkidar Iftikhar made a name to Asmat at 6:41pm for 56 seconds and once more at 6:48pm for 71 seconds.

He stated that Noor jumped from the balcony and tried to escape and Zahir ordered his chowkidar not to permit her to escape. Again Iftikhar made a name to Asmat, the lawyer stated, and maintained that Zahir’s parents had been conscious of what was occurring of their dwelling.

“The police station from their home is just half a kilometer away and instead of calling the police, they asked for the services of therapists,” Shah Khawar stated. It will not be true in authorized phrases that they weren’t certain to inform the police, he added. He was of the view that prima facie they’re additionally linked to the homicide crime.

Public prosecutor Nasim Zia argued that the accused was in touch with his parents and they didn’t trouble to inform the police. He stated when the servant made the decision, then the homicide was going down. He stated a pistol has additionally been seized and its license is within the father identify. “It is becoming a chain, which is evident from the CCTV footage and CDR. It’s a matter of dishonesty that they made attempts to rescue their son,” he stated.

Moreover, he requested the courtroom to reject the bail utility at this juncture.

Defense counsel Rizwan Abbasi responded to these factors stating that the homicide was not dedicated with the pistol. He stated that the offender ought to be punished and his shopper would facet with the complainant.

After listening to these arguments, the decide reserved the judgment for at some point. Whether Zahir’s parents get bail or not can be introduced on Thursday.

Noor, 27, the daughter of former diplomat Shaukat Mukadam, was discovered murdered at a residence in Islamabad’s Sector F-7/4 on July 20.

An FIR was registered later the identical day towards Zahir, who was arrested from the scene of the homicide, underneath Section 302 (premeditated homicide) of the Pakistan Penal Code on the grievance of the sufferer’s father.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.